Side by side
DSIP vs GHK-Cu
Both are discussed for anti-aging & longevity. What this site records about each, side by side. Every figure is on the compound's own page with the source it came from.
| DSIP | GHK-Cu | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Named for an effect it has never convincingly demonstrated. Fifty years of research have not established that it induces sleep in humans. | A naturally occurring copper-binding tripeptide with a long history in topical skincare research. Injected use is not what the research studied. |
| EvidenceHow much human evidence exists, not how well it works. | Early human trials | Preclinical |
| Regulatory statusReviewed 2026-08-18 | Not approved anywhere. Studied in small human trials in the 1980s without a treatment being developed. Sold as a research chemical. | Permitted as a topical cosmetic ingredient in the United States and widely sold as such. Not approved as an injectable medicine, and injectable material is a research chemical with no manufacturing standard behind it. |
| Routes | Subcutaneous | Subcutaneous, Topical |
| Half-life | Not recorded | 1 hours |
| Cheapest per mgVials only, read from vendors' own listings and dated on the price index. | $2.20/mg | $0.28/mg |
| Median per mg | $6.00/mg | $0.60/mg |
| Vendors with a price | 48 | 63 |
| Storage once mixed | Refrigerated at 2–8 °C. Do not freeze once mixed. | Refrigerated at 2–8 °C. The solution is characteristically blue; that colour is expected and is not a fault. |
Compare two other compounds · The full price index
This page is educational. It describes what published research reports, not what you should do. Peptides discussed here are largely not approved for human use, and nothing on BioAlmanac is medical advice. Nothing here ranks these two against each other. A table can show that one has more human evidence behind it or costs less per milligram; neither of those is a recommendation, and the right comparison for any person is one their doctor makes with them.