Retatrutide with MOTS-c
Commonly runA triple incretin agonist next to a mitochondrial peptide, on the argument that losing weight fast is easier than losing it well. The second half has never finished a human trial.
- Retatrutide
- MOTS-c
16 weeks
Reference
A stack is several compounds run together, each on its own dose and schedule. Combinations are discussed constantly and studied almost never, so every page here is explicit about where the evidence for the combination stops.
Check a combination against our interaction dataBuild and share your own
Written and cited by us, with full schedules
A triple incretin agonist next to a mitochondrial peptide, on the argument that losing weight fast is easier than losing it well. The second half has never finished a human trial.
16 weeks
The two-receptor growth hormone pairing with an oral secretagogue stacked on top. Three compounds, two of them acting on the same receptor.
12 weeks
The repair pairing with a copper peptide added for connective tissue. Three preclinical compounds, and the copper is the one with an actual ceiling.
10 weeks
An incretin agonist doing the established work, with an oral NNMT inhibitor added on a mechanism that has never been tested in a person. One half of this has phase 3 trials; the other half has mice.
16 weeks
The commonly run longevity pairing, and the one where the two compounds' problems are different. NAD+ has a delivery problem; Epitalon has a replication problem.
10 weeks
The most commonly run repair pairing. Two compounds on different schedules, on the reasoning that one builds blood supply and the other moves cells into the gap.
8 weeks
The standard growth hormone pairing. Two compounds on two different receptors, which is the one combination in this category with a real mechanistic argument.
12 weeks
The same two-receptor logic as CJC-1295 and ipamorelin, with the one GHRH analogue that has an approved indication behind it.
12 weeks
A GLP-1 agonist with an amylin analogue. The one combination in this category being developed as an actual drug, and the reason it earns a proper write-up.
20 weeks
The two components of GLOW without the TB-500, run separately so each can be dosed on its own schedule and route.
12 weeks
Individual people’s plans, published by them. We did not write them, check them, or verify anyone followed them — one person doing something is not evidence that it works.
Two compounds aimed at the same night from different ends: one at the sleep architecture itself, one at the growth hormone pulse that normally follows it. The honest caveat is that DSIP's human record is forty years old and small.
The two thymic peptides, which is the one group on this site with a genuine clinical record — for hepatitis B and as an adjuvant, not for staying well through a training block. That gap is the whole point of reading the profiles first.
The most commonly described recovery pairing. BPC-157 runs throughout; TB-500 front-loads and then stops, which is the part most write-ups leave out.
2 liked
See the schedule →Epitalon is one of the few things here described as a short course rather than a standing dose. NAD+ continues past it. The stop is the point.
1 liked
See the schedule →GHK-Cu is the one compound here with genuine cosmetic-science behind it, though topically rather than injected. BPC-157 is along for the repair side.
1 liked
See the schedule →A GLP-1 does not distinguish between fat and lean mass, and the trials report both coming off. This is the pairing people describe to protect the second, with the caveat that no trial has tested the combination.
MOTS-c and NAD+ get combined on the reasoning that one signals mitochondrial stress and the other supplies the coenzyme. That reasoning is plausible and untested in combination.
1 liked
See the schedule →Semax and selank are the pairing most often described together, and the reason is that they pull in different directions — one for focus, one for the anxiety that focus compounds tend to bring. Neither has a completed Western trial.
BPC-157 for the gut work it was originally studied for, with KPV for the inflammatory side. Both are peptides with no completed human trial, which is the main thing to know.
Semax with a defined stop rather than a standing prescription, on the reasoning that a compound whose only endpoint is how you say you feel is the easiest kind to keep taking without noticing whether it does anything.
Recovery in a deload week rather than during hard training. BPC-157 for connective tissue and KPV for the inflammatory load, both short.
Semaglutide with cagrilintide, which is the pairing the CagriSema trials tested as a single product. Worth reading both compound pages: this is the one combination here with real phase 3 behind it, and what is sold as a research chemical is not that product.
Next