Skip to content

Side by side

MK-677 vs Tesamorelin / CJC-1295 / Ipamorelin

Both are discussed for muscle & performance and anti-aging & longevity. What this site records about each, side by side. Every figure is on the compound's own page with the source it came from.

MK-677 and Tesamorelin / CJC-1295 / Ipamorelin compared on what BioAlmanac records.
 MK-677Tesamorelin / CJC-1295 / Ipamorelin
What it isAn orally active ghrelin receptor agonist that raises growth hormone and IGF-1. Not a peptide, and not injected. It is a small molecule taken by mouth.Three growth hormone secretagogues in one vial, commonly 6:3:3. Two of the three do the same job, which is the thing worth knowing before buying it.
EvidenceHow much human evidence exists, not how well it works.Early human trialsPreclinical
Regulatory statusReviewed 2026-08-12Not approved for human use in any jurisdiction. Development was not completed. It is widely sold as a 'research chemical' or mislabelled as a dietary supplement, which it is not. It is an unapproved drug.The mixture is not approved anywhere. Tesamorelin alone is FDA-approved for HIV-associated lipodystrophy, at a dose and for a purpose that has nothing to do with this blend.
RoutesOralSubcutaneous
Half-life24 hoursNot recorded
Cheapest per mgVials only, read from vendors' own listings and dated on the price index.$0.64/mg$3.90/mg
Median per mg$2.94/mg$6.95/mg
Vendors with a price62
Storage once mixedNot applicable. Liquid preparations sold in solution should follow the seller's storage instructions, which is a weaker guarantee than it sounds.Refrigerated at 2–8 °C and used within about 30 days. A blend cannot be split. A contaminated vial takes every component with it.

Compare two other compounds · The full price index

This page is educational. It describes what published research reports, not what you should do. Peptides discussed here are largely not approved for human use, and nothing on BioAlmanac is medical advice. Nothing here ranks these two against each other. A table can show that one has more human evidence behind it or costs less per milligram; neither of those is a recommendation, and the right comparison for any person is one their doctor makes with them.