Skip to content

Anti-aging & longevity

Cyclic Glycine-Proline

cGP · Cyclo(Gly-Pro) · cyclic glycyl-proline

PreclinicalReviewed 18 Aug 2026

Cyclic glycine-proline is what IGF-1 becomes. The growth factor is cleaved to a tripeptide, which cyclises into cGP, and that molecule circulates in blood and cerebrospinal fluid at measurable concentrations in everybody.

Its proposed role is regulatory rather than stimulatory, and that is the whole interest of it. cGP appears to modulate the binding between IGF-1 and its binding protein, changing how much IGF-1 is *available* rather than how much exists. Where IGF-1 LR3 is engineered to escape that regulation entirely, this is the molecule that does the regulating.

The human evidence is observational. cGP concentrations in blood and cerebrospinal fluid correlate with outcomes after stroke and with cognitive measures in older adults, in work largely from one New Zealand group. Correlation in a naturally occurring metabolite is a long way from a reason to inject it, and no trial has done so.

How it works

cGP is formed from the N-terminal tripeptide of IGF-1 and is present naturally in blood and cerebrospinal fluid.

It is proposed to normalise IGF-1 function by modulating its interaction with IGF binding protein 3: raising available IGF-1 when levels are low, reducing it when they are high. A regulator, not an agonist, if the model is right.

That framing is what makes it a different proposition from every other IGF-related compound. IGF-1 LR3 is designed to defeat binding protein regulation; this is claimed to restore it.

It also has documented neuroprotective activity in animal models of brain injury, which is consistent with the observational human findings without establishing them.

Regulatory status — United States

Not approved as a medicine anywhere. It occurs naturally in the body and in some foods, and is sold as a supplement in some markets and as a research chemical elsewhere. No interventional human trial has been published.

Last reviewed 18 Aug 2026. Regulatory positions in this category change frequently; we date this line so you can see how current it is.

What it is studied for

Each entry states the evidence behind it. We do not rank indications by effectiveness — for most compounds here, that would be a claim nobody can support.

Stroke recovery and cognitive function

Published review

Where the human data is, and what kind it is.

EvidenceObservational: blood and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations correlate with recovery after stroke and with cognitive measures in older adults. No interventional trial has administered it.

Neuroprotection

Published review

The preclinical thread.

EvidenceDemonstrated in animal models of brain injury.

Identity and clearance

Molecule

Class
Cyclic dipeptide; naturally occurring IGF-1 metabolite
Molecular weight
154.2 Da
Length
2 amino acids

Sequence

cyclo(Gly-Pro)

Occurs naturally in human blood and cerebrospinal fluid, and is also found in some foods.

Dose protocols reported in sources

Displayed for reference only. Every row says where it came from, and a trial protocol and a community convention are not the same kind of information. None of this is fed into the calculator, and none of it is a recommendation.

Dose protocols reported in sources, with the source of each.
GoalDoseFrequencyRouteUnits, 10 mg vialSourceStart this protocol
Commonly described community protocol10 mg – 50 mgOnce dailyOralUsually taken orally, which is unusual for something filed with peptides and reflects that it is a small, stable cyclic dipeptide, not a fragile chain. No trial establishes any dose.from 100 uCommunity practiceStart this

Start this copies a row into a protocol of your own, which you can then edit. Where a source gave a dose range or an ambiguous frequency, those fields arrive empty — we will not pick a number on your behalf.

CheckRows marked community practice describe what people commonly do, drawn from public discussion. They are not derived from any trial and are not evidence that a dose is safe or effective.

Safety

Reported effects

  • Effects of supplementing itCommunity practice

    Unknown

    No interventional human trial has been published, so no adverse event has been systematically recorded.

  • Consequences of altering IGF-1 availabilityPublished review

    Unknown

    If the regulatory model is right, this changes how much IGF-1 is active. IGF-1 availability is associated with cancer risk in population studies, and nothing establishes which direction supplementation pushes it in a given person.

When to stop

  • Any new lump, unexplained weight loss or unexplained persistent pain.
  • Any allergic response: rash, hives, facial swelling or difficulty breathing. Seek urgent care.
  • Any new neurological symptom.

Interactions and situations that need care

  • Active or previous cancerAvoid

    This is claimed to alter how much IGF-1 is biologically available, and IGF-1 availability is associated with risk for several cancers in population studies. A regulator that could move availability in either direction is not something to take blind in that setting.

  • Pregnancy and breastfeedingAvoid

    IGF-1 signalling is central to development, and no safety data exists.

  • Reading the observational data as a treatment effectUse caution

    The human findings are correlations between naturally occurring concentrations and outcomes. People who recover better may simply produce more of it. No trial has given it to anyone and measured what happened.

What to expect

HonestlyThere is no human efficacy data for this compound, so there is no evidence-based timeline to give. Any site publishing a week-by-week schedule of expected effects has invented it.

  • The human data is observational. Concentrations correlating with outcomes, not a trial of giving it to people.
  • The proposed role is regulating IGF-1 availability rather than adding to it, which makes it the conceptual opposite of IGF-1 LR3.
  • It occurs naturally in your blood already, and in some foods.
  • No interventional human trial has been published, so what supplementing it does is genuinely unknown.

Storage and handling

Freeze-dried powder
Powder at room temperature, dry and out of light.
After mixing
Refrigerated if made into solution, and used within days.

Printable one-pagerHow to reconstitute a vial, step by step

With other peptides

  • IGF-1 LR3caution

    These point in opposite directions. IGF-1 LR3 is engineered specifically to escape binding protein regulation; cGP is claimed to restore it. Taking both means deliberately driving IGF-1 availability up while adding something that modulates it, with no data on either half of that combination.

Check this against a whole stack

Checking your vial

Research chemicals carry no manufacturing standard, so what the vial looks like is often the only quality signal available before you use it. More on assessing quality and COAs.

  • White cake, clear solution

    Standard for a short peptide.

  • Collapsed cake or cloudy solution

    Heat damage or degradation. Do not use it.

Questions

Is this the same as taking IGF-1?
Close to the opposite. IGF-1 LR3 supplies the growth factor in a form built to escape the body's control of it. cGP is proposed to work on that control itself, normalising availability instead of raising it.
How good is the human evidence?
It is observational. Concentrations of a naturally occurring metabolite correlate with recovery and cognition, mostly in work from one group. Nobody has run a trial giving it to people.

References

  1. Cyclic glycine-proline and IGF-1 bioavailability: observational human findings and animal neuroprotection

    Neuroscience and metabolism literature, 2018 · Observational human studies with supporting animal work

    Humans and rodents

    Blood and cerebrospinal fluid cGP concentrations correlate with recovery after stroke and with cognitive measures in older adults. Animal models show neuroprotection. No interventional human trial has been published.

  2. Commonly reported community protocols

    Bioalmanac editorial summary of public community sources, 2026 · Not a study

    Records dose and route patterns described in public discussion. Carries no evidential weight about safety or effect.

Keep this page honest

If something here is wrong, out of date, or missing a source, tell us and we will fix it and say that we did.

Suggest a correction

This page is educational. It describes what published research reports, not what you should do. Peptides discussed here are largely not approved for human use, and nothing on Bioalmanac is medical advice. No clinician reviews these pages.

Page last updated 18 Aug 2026