Skip to content

Noopept

OmberacetamN-phenylacetyl-L-prolylglycine ethyl esterGVS-111
Approved for another indication

Evidence

Approved (ex-US)

Typical vial

10 mg

Route

Oral

Status

Russia and United States

What it is

A Russian prescription nootropic, registered there since 1996. Not a peptide despite the name, and unapproved everywhere else.

Reviewed 18 Aug 2026

Noopept is a small molecule built from a dipeptide backbone, which is why it is filed with peptides and why that filing is misleading. It is not injected, not reconstituted, and behaves like a conventional oral drug.

It has been a registered prescription medicine in Russia since 1996, prescribed for cognitive impairment after stroke or injury and for age-related decline. That is a genuine regulatory status with a clinical programme behind it. It is also a Russian programme, carrying the reporting and replication limits this site describes for that body of work generally.

Outside Russia it is unapproved and sold as a supplement or research chemical. In the United Kingdom it is a controlled substance under the Psychoactive Substances Act, which is a distinction worth knowing before ordering it.

How it works

Noopept is metabolised to cycloprolylglycine, an endogenous dipeptide, which is thought to be the active form. That relationship to a naturally occurring molecule is the basis of the mechanistic argument for it.

It is described as raising BDNF and nerve growth factor in the hippocampus in animal work, and as modulating glutamate receptor signalling. Both are plausible routes to the cognitive effects claimed, and neither is established in humans outside the Russian programme.

It is often described as a racetam, and structurally it is not one. The resemblance is functional rather than chemical, which matters if you are reasoning about interactions from drug class.

What it is studied for

Each entry states the evidence behind it. We do not rank indications by effectiveness — for most compounds here, that would be a claim nobody can support.

  • Cognitive impairment after stroke or injury

    Published review

    The registered Russian indication.

    EvidenceRussian clinical work supporting registration since 1996. Not replicated to contemporary standards outside that programme.

  • Cognitive enhancement in healthy people

    Community practice

    Why it is bought outside Russia.

    EvidenceNo trial has studied it in healthy people for cognitive enhancement. The registered indication involves existing impairment.

Regulatory status

Last reviewed 18 Aug 2026. Positions in this category change frequently, so we date the line.

Russia and United States

A registered prescription medicine in Russia since 1996 for cognitive impairment following stroke or injury. Not approved in the United States or the European Union, and controlled in the United Kingdom under the Psychoactive Substances Act.

Identity and clearance

What the molecule is, and how long a dose stays measurable.

Molecule

Class
Small molecule derived from a dipeptide, not a peptide drug
Molecular weight
318.4 Da

Taken orally. Nothing here is reconstituted, and the calculator on this site does not apply.

Dose protocols reported in sources

Displayed for reference only. Every row says where it came from, and a trial protocol and a community convention are not the same kind of information. None of this is fed into the calculator, and none of it is a recommendation.

Dose protocols reported in sources, with the source of each.
GoalDoseFrequencyRouteUnits, 10 mg vialSourceStart this protocol
Registered Russian dosing10 mg – 30 mg10 mg two or three times daily, in courses of 6 to 8 weeksOralThe registered protocol is a course rather than continuous use. Note the doses are milligrams, unlike most of what surrounds it on this site. A 10 mg figure here is not comparable to a 10 mg peptide dose.from 100 uPublished reviewStart this

The doses above in syringe units, for the vial you have:

Start this copies a row into a protocol of your own, which you can then edit. Where a source gave a dose range or an ambiguous frequency, those fields arrive empty — we will not pick a number on your behalf.

Cycling

Published review

6 to 8 weeks on, At least a month between courses off.

The course structure comes from the registered Russian protocol rather than from community convention.

Safety

Reported effects, the situations that need care, and the ones that mean stop.

Read before dosing

Reported effects

  • Irritability and disturbed sleepCommunity practice

    Commonly reported

    The most frequent complaint, and the reason the registered protocol avoids evening doses.

  • HeadacheCommunity practice

    Commonly reported

  • Raised blood pressurePublished review

    Reported in the Russian literature

    Noted in the registered product information, particularly in older patients.

  • Long-term effects outside a course structurePublished review

    Unknown

    The registered use is a 6 to 8 week course. Continuous use has not been studied.

When to stop

  • Irritability, agitation or sleep disturbance that does not settle.
  • Raised blood pressure. Measure it rather than guessing.
  • Persistent headache.
  • Any allergic response: rash, hives, facial swelling or difficulty breathing. Seek urgent care.

Interactions and situations that need care

  • Uncontrolled hypertensionAvoid

    Raised blood pressure is noted in the registered product information, particularly in older patients, who are the population most likely to be taking it for its registered indication.

  • Pregnancy and breastfeedingAvoid

    No reproductive or developmental safety data.

  • Severe kidney or liver impairmentAvoid

    Listed as a contraindication in the registered Russian product information.

  • Ordering it into the United KingdomUse caution

    It is controlled there under the Psychoactive Substances Act. That is a legal fact — not a safety one — and it applies regardless of what the compound does.

What to expect

What the sources describe over time, and how confident anyone can be about it.

  • It is a registered prescription medicine in Russia, which is a real status, and one resting on a body of work nobody has replicated to contemporary standards elsewhere.
  • It is not a peptide. It is a small molecule taken as a tablet, and it appears alongside peptides only because of where it is sold.
  • The registered indication is cognitive impairment after stroke or injury. Nobody has studied it in healthy people for enhancement.
  • The registered protocol is a 6 to 8 week course, not continuous use.
  • It is controlled in the UK.

Storage and combinations

How to keep it, and what it does and does not go with.

Storage and handling

Freeze-dried powder
Tablets or powder at room temperature, dry and out of light.
After mixing
Not applicable. This is taken orally.

Printable one-pagerHow to reconstitute a vial, step by step

Stacks with Noopept in them

Documented combinations and plans people have published, with full schedules.

Published by people running it. Their plans, not ours — one person doing something is not evidence that it works.

Checking your vial

Research chemicals carry no manufacturing standard, so what the vial looks like is often the only quality signal available before you use it.

  • You cannot assess a powder by looking at it

    No visual check distinguishes this from any other white powder, and it is active at milligram doses where a measuring error matters.

Vocabulary on this page

Research chemical
A legal label, not a quality grade. It describes what a seller is permitted to sell you, and says nothing about what is in the vial.
Evidence level
The category of human evidence behind a compound, from preclinical through to approved. Stated on every profile here as a category, not an adjective.
Peptide
A short chain of amino acids: the same building blocks as a protein, in a chain short enough to behave differently.
Protocol
One compound, with a dose, a frequency and a length: the plan, as opposed to what was actually taken.

The whole glossary →

Questions

Reader questions
Is Noopept a peptide?
No. It is built from a dipeptide backbone, which is where the name and the filing come from, but it is a small molecule taken as a tablet. Nothing about it is reconstituted or injected.
Is it a racetam?
Not structurally. It is often described as one because the effects are compared to piracetam, but it is a different kind of molecule, and that matters if you are reasoning about interactions from drug class.
Is it legal?
It is a prescription medicine in Russia, unapproved in the US and EU, and controlled in the UK under the Psychoactive Substances Act. Those are three different situations.

References

Everything on this page that came from a source, with the source.

  1. Russian clinical literature on regulatory peptides and nootropics: scope and limits

    Russian pharmacology and psychiatry literature, 2015 · Body of clinical work, largely unregistered and not blinded to contemporary standards

    Humans

    Reports anxiolytic, nootropic and neuroprotective effects supporting registration of several of these compounds in Russia. Methodology, reporting standards and the absence of independent replication limit how much weight the findings carry elsewhere.

  2. Commonly reported community protocols

    BioAlmanac editorial summary of public community sources, 2026 · Not a study

    Records dose and route patterns described in public discussion. Carries no evidential weight about safety or effect.

Keep this page honest

If something here is wrong, out of date, or missing a source, tell us and we will fix it and say that we did.

Suggest a correction

This page is educational. It describes what published research reports, not what you should do. Peptides discussed here are largely not approved for human use, and nothing on BioAlmanac is medical advice. No clinician reviews these pages.

Page last updated 18 Aug 2026