Skip to content

Livagen

Lys-Glu-Asp-AlaLiver peptide
Preclinical

Evidence

Preclinical

Typical vial

10 mg

Route

2 routes

Status

United States

What it is

The liver peptide of the Khavinson family. There is real research behind it — all of it from one institute — none of it independently reproduced.

Reviewed 18 Aug 2026

Livagen is one of the short peptide bioregulators developed at the St Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology, each of which is assigned to a specific tissue. It is assigned to hepatic tissue, and the originating work describes it as supporting liver function and as producing chromatin decondensation in lymphocytes.

Most people arrive at Livagen after a liver blood test came back marked. That is the wrong order of operations: raised liver enzymes have a differential diagnosis that runs from a heavy fortnight to something that needs treating this year, and the difference is established by working out the cause rather than by taking something for it.

Everything else about Livagen is inherited. It rests on one institute's work, spanning decades and never replicated by anyone outside it, and on a proposed mechanism no other compound on this site shares: a peptide two to four amino acids long, said to reach the nucleus and switch on the genes of one tissue. Liver function is measurable, which makes the absence of any independent measurement of this compound more conspicuous than it is elsewhere in the family. That argument and the structural objection to it are set out under Khavinson bioregulator in the glossary, once, because they apply identically to all of them.

How it works

Livagen is proposed to enter the cell nucleus and bind DNA directly, promoting expression of genes associated with the liver. Applied to the liver, the claim is expression of genes associated with hepatocyte function and regeneration.

No independent group has demonstrated any of that. Because the mechanism is described as genomic rather than receptor-mediated, none of the pharmacokinetic reasoning used elsewhere on this site applies: there is no receptor occupancy to model, and no dose-response curve established outside the originating work.

What it is studied for

Each entry states the evidence behind it. We do not rank indications by effectiveness — for most compounds here, that would be a claim nobody can support.

  • Support for the liver

    Published review

    The claim Livagen is sold on, and the only one the originating literature makes for it.

    EvidenceReported in Russian clinical and animal work from a single institute. Not registered — not blinded to contemporary standards — and never independently replicated.

Regulatory status

Last reviewed 18 Aug 2026. Positions in this category change frequently, so we date the line.

United States

Not approved for human use in the United States, the European Union or the United Kingdom. Some peptides in this family are registered in Russia as supplements or medicines. Livagen is sold elsewhere as a research chemical.

Identity and clearance

What the molecule is, and how long a dose stays measurable.

Molecule

Class
Short synthetic peptide bioregulator
Length
4 amino acids

Sequence

Lys-Glu-Asp-Ala

Most of this family shares a glutamic acid and aspartic acid core, differing only in one or two flanking residues.

Dose protocols reported in sources

Displayed for reference only. Every row says where it came from, and a trial protocol and a community convention are not the same kind of information. None of this is fed into the calculator, and none of it is a recommendation.

Mixed sources
Dose protocols reported in sources, with the source of each.
GoalDoseFrequencyRouteUnits, 10 mg vialSourceStart this protocol
Course described in community sources1 mg – 2 mgDaily for a 10-day course, repeated a few times a yearSubcutaneousThe 10-day course is the pattern described across this whole family. It is convention, not a finding. No dose-ranging study establishes it, and the same figures appear for peptides assigned to entirely different organs.10–20 uCommunity practiceStart this

The doses above in syringe units, for the vial you have:

Start this copies a row into a protocol of your own, which you can then edit. Where a source gave a dose range or an ambiguous frequency, those fields arrive empty — we will not pick a number on your behalf.

CheckRows marked community practice describe what people commonly do, drawn from public discussion. They are not derived from any trial and are not evidence that a dose is safe or effective.

Cycling

Community practice

10 days on, Months between courses off.

Described consistently across the family, and consistently without a study behind it.

Work out what to draw

Pre-filled with a 20 mg vial as a worked example. These are not recommended values — change them to match the vial in front of you.

Tool
Dose unit
Your syringe
010203040506070809010020 units0.2 mL

Draw to 20 units on a 1 mL U-100 syringe. That is 0.2 mL, containing 2 mg of Livagen.

Concentration10mg / mL
Volume drawn0.2mL
Doses per vial10doses
Per unit100mcg / unit

20 units sits exactly on a printed line.

BioAlmanac performs arithmetic on values you enter. It does not recommend doses, schedules or compounds, and nothing here is medical advice. Confirm every calculation against your vial and syringe before drawing, and speak with a licensed healthcare provider.

Open this calculation in the full calculator

Units, concentration, bacteriostatic water — the glossary defines the vocabulary, and a unit is not a fixed volume.

Safety

Reported effects, the situations that need care, and the ones that mean stop.

Read before dosing

Reported effects

  • Generally described as well toleratedPublished review

    Reported in the Russian literature

    That literature is not designed to detect adverse events reliably, so an absence of reports is weak evidence of safety rather than good evidence of it.

  • Injection site irritationCommunity practice

    Occasionally reported

  • Everything elseCommunity practice

    Unknown

    No adverse event has been systematically recorded outside the originating programme.

When to stop

  • Any allergic response: rash, hives, facial swelling or difficulty breathing. Seek urgent care.
  • An injection site that becomes hot, spreading or produces pus.
  • Any new or unexplained symptom you would ordinarily see a doctor about.

Interactions and situations that need care

  • Active or previous cancerAvoid

    The proposed mechanism is switching on gene expression in a target tissue. Whatever one makes of that claim, deliberately pursuing it in someone with malignancy has no supporting evidence and an obvious direction of concern.

  • Pregnancy and breastfeedingAvoid

    No reproductive or developmental safety data, for a compound whose claimed mechanism is gene expression.

  • Known liver diseaseUse caution

    Liver disease is monitored with blood tests and imaging, and progresses silently. Treating it with an unstudied compound instead of establishing what is actually wrong lets a diagnosable condition advance unmeasured.

  • Expecting the Russian literature to mean what a trial meansUse caution

    It is real research, produced over decades, and it is not evaluable the way a registered randomised trial is. Four decades without independent replication is information in its own right, and it points one way.

What to expect

What the sources describe over time, and how confident anyone can be about it.

No human efficacy data

HonestlyThere is no human efficacy data for this compound, so there is no evidence-based timeline to give. Any site publishing a week-by-week schedule of expected effects has invented it.

  • No independent group has replicated the central findings of this family in forty years.
  • The proposed mechanism, short peptides acting directly on chromatin, is not how anything else on this site is understood to work.
  • Peptides in this family differing by one amino acid are assigned to different organs. If that seems like a lot of specificity for one residue, that is the right reaction.
  • The 10-day course pattern is identical across compounds assigned to entirely different tissues, which is a convention, not a dosing finding.
  • Nothing here establishes an effect in people, and the absence of reported harm is not the same as evidence of safety.

Storage and combinations

How to keep it, and what it does and does not go with.

Storage and handling

Freeze-dried powder
Refrigerated at 2–8 °C, protected from light.
After mixing
Refrigerated at 2–8 °C. Do not freeze once mixed.
Long-term, frozen
Unopened powder is stable at −20 °C or colder.

Printable one-pagerHow to reconstitute a vial, step by step

Checking your vial

Research chemicals carry no manufacturing standard, so what the vial looks like is often the only quality signal available before you use it.

  • White cake, clear solution

    Standard for a very short peptide.

  • Collapsed cake or cloudy solution

    Heat damage or degradation. Do not use it.

Vocabulary on this page

Khavinson bioregulator
A family of very short peptides from one St Petersburg institute, each assigned to a different organ. The claim is that they act directly on DNA rather than through a receptor.
Batch number
An identifier for one production run, printed on the vial and on the certificate that tests it. Matching the two is what makes the certificate mean anything about the vial in your hand.
Injection site
Where on the body an injection is given. Rotating between sites is standard practice for anything given repeatedly.
Peptide
A short chain of amino acids: the same building blocks as a protein, in a chain short enough to behave differently.
Protocol
One compound, with a dose, a frequency and a length: the plan, as opposed to what was actually taken.

The whole glossary →

Questions

Reader questions
Is there any Western research on this?
Very little, and none that reproduces the central claims. The body of work is almost entirely from one Russian institute, and it has stood unreplicated elsewhere for decades.
Will it bring liver enzymes down?
Nothing establishes that it does anything to them. Enzymes fall when whatever is raising them stops, and identifying that is the entire task. A compound taken instead of identifying it is a way of watching the number without learning anything from it.
Does the oral form work?
Both oral and injected forms are sold with the same claims. For most peptides the route changes everything, because digestion destroys them. That the same effect is claimed either way is a reason for scepticism rather than reassurance.

References

Everything on this page that came from a source, with the source.

  1. Short peptide bioregulators: the Khavinson programme and its evidential limits

    Russian gerontology and bioregulation literature, 2014 · Body of largely unregistered clinical and animal work from a single institute

    Humans and animals

    Reports tissue-specific effects across a family of di-, tri- and tetrapeptides, attributed to direct interaction with chromatin. Trial registration, pre-specified protocols, blinding to contemporary standards and independent replication are largely absent, and no group outside the originating institute has reproduced the central findings.

  2. Commonly reported community protocols

    BioAlmanac editorial summary of public community sources, 2026 · Not a study

    Records the 10-day course pattern described across this family in public discussion. Carries no evidential weight about safety or effect.

Livagen compared with

Also compared with GHK-Cu, Ipamorelin, CJC-1295, Tesamorelin, MK-677, GHRP-2.

Keep this page honest

If something here is wrong, out of date, or missing a source, tell us and we will fix it and say that we did.

Suggest a correction

This page is educational. It describes what published research reports, not what you should do. Peptides discussed here are largely not approved for human use, and nothing on BioAlmanac is medical advice. No clinician reviews these pages.

Page last updated 18 Aug 2026